Skip to main content

Yes, and it's about the Mob

Before there were the Russians and the fundamentalists, there was the Mob, the connections that enabled Trump to achieve what he did as a businessman, the basis for the assessment by his supporters that he's a success, that he knows how to do deals.  Undoubtedly some talent for deal-making there must be to work with organized crime while keeping up appearances; that's not a deal-making talent I'm interested in seeing in leadership, but it is a talent, and I can sort of understand why the people who like and support Trump see it as such.

Trump's deep Mob ties have been documented in many places, notably for my own reading pleasure in The Making of Donald Trump by David Cay Johnston and Mafia Don: Donald Trump's 40 years of Mob ties by H.S. Glushakow.  On the one hand, his facility in dealing with the Mafia in the course of doing his business (big buildings, casinos, wrestling and reality television) acts for his supporters as the symbolic shadow of his repeated statements that as a businessman he has always taken advantage of any subsidies or loopholes offered by the government, so that as it were he knows where the bodies are buried and can act to get rid of them.

But that of course is the thinking that excuses any malfeasance by Trump or the like while screaming "lock her up" in conditioned response to the word "Hillary".  It's moral exceptionalism of the worst order, not unrelated to the salvation-grabbing of the fundamentalist Christians.  For the rest of us, the salient analogies between Trump's existence as a Mob wheeler-dealer and his existence as political leader are the absolute need for loyalty, and the punishing of "betrayal," interpreted however the Don chooses to do so.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Color of Law

My review  of   The Color of Law     , a book by   Richard Rothstein : This carefully documented, eloquently argued history of U.S. government policies of overt racial segregation post-Jim Crow, and of the results of these policies, should be required reading, at least for all white Americans who've been inculcated with the myth of "de facto" segregation over the past fifty years (my lifetime). This is a book that breaks the narrative of illusions and lies essential to Trump's and Bannon's racist propaganda -- and ultimately, the facts of this book are part of what must be used to break the spell of lies propping up not only them, but the system of thought that allows white people no different from myself to believe in both gun-supported self-defense of themselves, and police war against black men who presumptively "appear" to be armed criminals.

A phoenix out of the bonfire

I hereby declare myself a member of the Radical Republican Party, whose intent it is to displace the Republican Party as it stands in the two-party system of the Union. The Republican Party as it stands has demonstrated itself to be utterly compromised.  It is rotten to the core.  Hence two of the Radical Republican Party's founding principles must be: 1) The impeachment and removal from office of Donald Trump. 2) The dissolution of the existing Republican party and defeat at the polls of all Republicans in the U.S. Congress and the state houses of all American states or territories. Additionally, the Radical Republican Party chooses this moment to re-found on the principles of the Republican Party at the end of the War of Secession: 1) First and foremost, the process of making redress and reparation to the descendents of America's slave population must be picked up at the point of its abandonment, at the end of Reconstruction in 1877.  The entailments of redress...

Is it about the darned fundamentalists?

"Fundamentalist" is shorthand for my ignorance, of course, as is "evangelical."  Not that I have a desire to know firsthand what it's like to attend a small enveloping community dominated by a cult leader with enough money to rent a space, which is how I think of the galaxy of Southern churches out of which the support for Trump and Moore emerges naturally.  It's a little ridiculous for those of us without any inclination to Christianity to go after the lax moral framework of such folk (though much less ridiculous for those who still practice mainstream forms of Christianity or other God-fearing faiths), in my opinion, because so much of their practice and preaching has to do with the salvation of undeserving sinners, and so little of it with the responsibilities of probity, let alone charity.  And that offered salvation might be what draws the angry, the despairing and the depressed to those who will accept them as they are, so we, who fear not the Lord and...